Cybersecurity The Dangerous Gap: Why Your Security Testing Budget Doesn't Match Your Attacker's Effort

Overview

When it comes to cybersecurity testing, many organizations operate under dangerous misconceptions that could leave them vulnerable. Ted Harrington, ethical hacking expert and bestselling author, breaks down a critical disconnect in how companies approach security testing budgets versus how attackers operate

When it comes to cybersecurity testing, many organizations operate under dangerous misconceptions that could leave them vulnerable. Ted Harrington, ethical hacking expert and bestselling author, breaks down a critical disconnect in how companies approach security testing budgets versus how attackers operate

This misconception reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of how attackers work. Companies often underspend on security testing, assuming that minimal investment will provide adequate protection. However, this approach ignores a crucial reality: attackers will invest significant time and resources if they determine a target is worthwhile.

Security leaders might be following these misconceptions unwittingly. Harrington outlines a three-step process to address this gap

• Recognize that these misconceptions exist
• Address and correct the misconceptions
• Follow a better path forward with improved security strategies

The key takeaway is that organizations need to align their security testing investments with the level of effort potential attackers might expend. A minimal investment in security testing won't adequately protect against determined adversaries who are willing to invest substantial resources to breach your systems.

Watch the full video to learn more about how to properly invest in security testing and protect your organization against modern threats.

Watch to the Episode